{"id":7890,"date":"2025-01-28T06:23:42","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T06:23:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/?p=7890"},"modified":"2025-01-28T06:23:42","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T06:23:42","slug":"comparison-of-chatgpt-4o-and-gemini-15-pro","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/comparison-of-chatgpt-4o-and-gemini-15-pro\/","title":{"rendered":"Srovn\u00e1n\u00ed ChatGPT 4o a Gemini 1.5 Pro"},"content":{"rendered":"

Krajina AI chatbot\u016f se vyv\u00edj\u00ed neb\u00fdvalou rychlost\u00ed. Jakmile jedna organizace odhal\u00ed sv\u016fj nejnov\u011bj\u0161\u00ed model, konkurenti jej rychle n\u00e1sleduj\u00ed a sna\u017e\u00ed se navz\u00e1jem p\u0159edb\u011bhnout. Navzdory tomu, \u017ee se ChatGPT od OpenAI t\u011b\u0161\u00ed brzk\u00e9mu veden\u00ed v t\u00e9to konkuren\u010dn\u00ed ar\u00e9n\u011b, soupe\u0159i jako Gemini rychle z\u00edskali trakci a sofistikovanost.<\/p>\n

Mezi sou\u010dasn\u00e9 pr\u016fkopn\u00edky ve v\u00fdvoji AI chatbot\u016f pat\u0159\u00ed modely ChatGPT a Gemini. V tomto srovn\u00e1n\u00ed se zam\u011b\u0159ujeme konkr\u00e9tn\u011b na model ChatGPT 4o a Gemini 1.5 Pro, co\u017e jsou oba pr\u00e9miov\u00e9 nab\u00eddky p\u0159izp\u016fsoben\u00e9 pro r\u016fzn\u00e9 \u00fakoly.<\/p>\n

V\u00fdb\u011br mezi t\u011bmito p\u0159edn\u00edmi modely je nezbytn\u00fd pro efektivn\u00ed \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed va\u0161ich jedine\u010dn\u00fdch po\u017eadavk\u016f. Proto jsme provedli \u0159adu p\u0159\u00edsn\u00fdch v\u00fdkonnostn\u00edch test\u016f, abychom zjistili, kter\u00fd model vynik\u00e1 v mnoha \u00faloh\u00e1ch. Poj\u010fme se pono\u0159it do anal\u00fdzy!<\/p>\n

1. Test z matematiky<\/h2>\n

Na\u0161\u00ed prvn\u00ed v\u00fdzvou je vy\u0159e\u0161it slo\u017eitou matematickou h\u00e1danku navr\u017eenou tak, aby zm\u011b\u0159ila uva\u017eovac\u00ed schopnosti ka\u017ed\u00e9ho modelu:<\/p>\n

V\u00fdzva:<\/strong> If 1=3, 2=3, 3=5, 4=4, and 5=4, what is 6?<\/code><\/p>\n

Kl\u00ed\u010d k vy\u0159e\u0161en\u00ed t\u00e9to h\u00e1danky spo\u010d\u00edv\u00e1 v po\u010d\u00edt\u00e1n\u00ed p\u00edsmen v \u010d\u00edseln\u00fdch jm\u00e9nech: jedna m\u00e1 t\u0159i p\u00edsmena, t\u0159i m\u00e1 p\u011bt, a n\u00e1sledn\u011b \u0161est m\u00e1 t\u0159i p\u00edsmena. Oba modely dok\u00e1zaly dosp\u011bt ke spr\u00e1vn\u00e9mu \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed, ale jejich vysv\u011btlen\u00ed se li\u0161ila:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

Zat\u00edmco ob\u011b odpov\u011bdi byly p\u0159esn\u00e9, ChatGPT poskytl o n\u011bco jemn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed vysv\u011btlen\u00ed a poznamenal, \u017ee toto cvi\u010den\u00ed se op\u00edr\u00e1 sp\u00ed\u0161e o lingvistick\u00e9 ne\u017e numerick\u00e9 porozum\u011bn\u00ed. Tato nuance je v\u0161ak subjektivn\u00ed a nesni\u017euje Bl\u00ed\u017eencovu spr\u00e1vnost.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> Kravata<\/strong><\/p>\n

2. Sumariza\u010dn\u00ed test<\/h2>\n

Tento segment posuzoval schopnost ka\u017ed\u00e9ho modelu zhustit dlouh\u00fd 27str\u00e1nkov\u00fd v\u00fdzkumn\u00fd \u010dl\u00e1nek do stru\u010dn\u00e9ho shrnut\u00ed o m\u00e9n\u011b ne\u017e 100 slovech. D\u016fraz byl kladen na to, jak\u00fd obsah ka\u017ed\u00fd model zahrnul nebo vynechal ve sv\u00fdch souhrnech.<\/p>\n

Zde je n\u00e1vod, jak se v\u00fdstupy li\u0161ily mezi ChatGPT 4o a Gemini 1.5 Pro:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

ChatGPT p\u0159edvedl v\u00fdjime\u010dn\u00e9 schopnosti sumarizace a vytvo\u0159il kompletn\u00ed shrnut\u00ed v limitu 100 slov, kter\u00e9 zahrnuje v\u0161echny d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e9 body. Informace v\u0161ak prezentovala jako jeden blok textu bez p\u0159\u00edm\u00fdch citac\u00ed z p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku.<\/p>\n

Naproti tomu Bl\u00ed\u017eenci si tak\u00e9 vedli obdivuhodn\u011b a vytvo\u0159ili 83slovn\u00fd souhrn podpo\u0159en\u00fd odkazy na konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti textu. Zat\u00edmco ChatGPT vynikal komplexnost\u00ed, zahrnut\u00ed citac\u00ed Gemini mu poskytlo d\u016fle\u017eitou v\u00fdhodu.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> Bl\u00ed\u017eenci<\/strong><\/p>\n

3. Test \u201eKonec slovem\u201c.<\/h2>\n

Tento jednoduch\u00fd \u00fakol vy\u017eadoval sestaven\u00ed 10 v\u011bt, kter\u00e9 kon\u010d\u00ed slovem \u201em\u00ed\u010d\u201c.Pro jednoduchost \u00fakolu je pozoruhodn\u00e9, \u017ee se s n\u00edm mnoho model\u016f pot\u00fdk\u00e1.<\/p>\n

V\u00fdzva:<\/strong> Provide 10 sentences ending with the word 'ball'.<\/code><\/p>\n

ChatGPT p\u0159ekvapiv\u011b vytvo\u0159il pouze 3 platn\u00e9 v\u011bty, zat\u00edmco Bl\u00ed\u017eenci jej p\u0159ekonali 6 v\u011btami spr\u00e1vn\u011b zakon\u010den\u00fdmi \u201ekoule\u201c.Zde je pohled na jejich pokusy:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

P\u0159esto\u017ee oba modely nedos\u00e1hly c\u00edle 10 v\u011bt, v\u00fdstup Gemini prok\u00e1zal vynikaj\u00edc\u00ed uchopen\u00ed dan\u00e9 instrukce.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> Bl\u00ed\u017eenci<\/strong><\/p>\n

4. Test zdrav\u00e9ho rozumu<\/h2>\n

Tyto testy p\u0159edstavuj\u00ed z\u00e1bavnou v\u00fdzvu, proto\u017ee AI zde \u010dasto chybuje. Polo\u017eili jsme p\u0159\u00edmou ot\u00e1zku:<\/p>\n

V\u00fdzva:<\/strong> If a blue ball falls into the red sea, what color is it now?<\/code><\/p>\n

Oba modely poskytly p\u0159esn\u00e9 odpov\u011bdi a identifikovaly, \u017ee barva m\u00ed\u010de z\u016fstane modr\u00e1. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b nuance v jejich vysv\u011btlen\u00ed se li\u0161ily:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

Gemini nab\u00eddl kr\u00e1tkou odpov\u011b\u010f, zat\u00edmco ChatGPT poskytl dal\u0161\u00ed kontext. Zda je tato hloubka nutn\u00e1, je subjektivn\u00ed, ale v identifikaci barvy m\u00ed\u010de oba modely excelovaly.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> Kravata<\/strong><\/p>\n

5. Test kreativity<\/h2>\n

Vyu\u017eit\u00ed AI pro kreativn\u00ed vypr\u00e1v\u011bn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh\u016f m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt nesm\u00edrn\u011b u\u017eite\u010dn\u00e9. Pov\u011b\u0159ili jsme ka\u017edou um\u011blou inteligenci, aby sestavila kr\u00e1tk\u00fd p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh se Santou ve stylu 100 slov, jako by ho napsal opil\u00fd Chaucer.<\/p>\n

V\u00fdzva:<\/strong> Write a short story about Santa in the style of a drunken Chaucer in 100 words.<\/code><\/p>\n

Zde jsou jejich kreativn\u00ed ztv\u00e1rn\u011bn\u00ed:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

Subjektivn\u00ed povaha kreativity zt\u011b\u017euje vyhl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed jasn\u00e9ho v\u00edt\u011bze. Pozoruhodn\u00e9 je, \u017ee Bl\u00ed\u017eenci \u010dasto za\u010d\u00ednaj\u00ed kreativn\u00ed \u00fakoly fr\u00e1z\u00ed \u201eHark\u201c, kter\u00e1 se stala jeho preferovanou stylistickou volbou. P\u0159esto vypr\u00e1v\u011bn\u00ed ChatGPT v tomto kole vyniklo.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> ChatGPT<\/strong><\/p>\n

6. Test generov\u00e1n\u00ed obrazu<\/h2>\n

Tento test hodnotil mo\u017enosti vizu\u00e1ln\u00edho generov\u00e1n\u00ed ka\u017ed\u00e9ho modelu AI. Vyzvali jsme je, aby vytvo\u0159ili obr\u00e1zek na z\u00e1klad\u011b n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed v\u00fdzvy:<\/p>\n

V\u00fdzva:<\/strong> Create an image of a black cat gazing out at fields of barley bathed in evening yellow light, in the style of Vincent Van Gogh.<\/code><\/p>\n

ChatGPT byl o sekundu nebo dv\u011b rychlej\u0161\u00ed, ale kone\u010dn\u00fd obr\u00e1zek Gemini zobrazoval sc\u00e9nu s v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed propracovanost\u00ed. P\u0159esto\u017ee oba modely uchopily um\u011bleck\u00fd styl Van Gogha, subjektivn\u00ed kvalita sn\u00edmk\u016f se li\u0161ila:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

Stoj\u00ed za zm\u00ednku, \u017ee ChatGPT umo\u017e\u0148uje \u00fapravy obr\u00e1zk\u016f po vygenerov\u00e1n\u00ed \u2013 v\u00fdhoda, kterou Gemini v sou\u010dasnosti postr\u00e1d\u00e1. Proto\u017ee oba obr\u00e1zky \u00fa\u010dinn\u011b zt\u011bles\u0148uj\u00ed Van Gogh\u016fv charakteristick\u00fd styl, volba z\u00e1vis\u00ed na div\u00e1kovi, i kdy\u017e se p\u0159ikl\u00e1n\u00edme ke Gemini.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> Bl\u00ed\u017eenci<\/strong><\/p>\n

7. Multimod\u00e1ln\u00ed generativn\u00ed test<\/h2>\n

Znalosti um\u011bl\u00e9 inteligence se testuj\u00ed v integrovan\u00fdch re\u017eimech, proto\u017ee \u010dasto vynikaj\u00ed v izolovan\u00fdch \u00fakolech, ale pot\u00fdkaj\u00ed se s t\u011bmi komplexn\u00edmi. Oba modely jsme za\u00fakolovali, aby sepsali d\u011btsk\u00fd p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh o sportovn\u00edm um\u011bn\u00ed a do cesty jsme vlo\u017eili t\u0159i ilustrace.<\/p>\n

V\u00fdzva:<\/strong> Napi\u0161te kr\u00e1tk\u00fd p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh pro d\u011bti o sportovn\u00edm chov\u00e1n\u00ed a p\u0159idejte 3 obr\u00e1zky, kde je to vhodn\u00e9.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

ChatGPT vytvo\u0159il poutav\u00fd p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh navrstven\u00fd mor\u00e1ln\u00edmi \u00favahami a hladce zakomponovan\u00fdmi obr\u00e1zky. Na rozd\u00edl od toho, zat\u00edmco Bl\u00ed\u017eenci dok\u00e1zali vytvo\u0159it p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh, postr\u00e1dal jasnost a soudr\u017enost a nepoda\u0159ilo se mu vytvo\u0159it \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 obrazy pro vypr\u00e1v\u011bn\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Na z\u00e1klad\u011b p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010div\u00e9ho a snadno sledovateln\u00e9ho doru\u010den\u00ed bylo toto rozhodnut\u00ed jednoduch\u00e9.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> ChatGPT<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

8. Test p\u0159ekladu<\/h2>\n

Abychom zm\u011b\u0159ili p\u0159ekladatelsk\u00e9 schopnosti t\u011bchto model\u016f, po\u017e\u00e1dali jsme ka\u017ed\u00fd, aby p\u0159elo\u017eil v\u00fdb\u011br z hindsk\u00e9 pov\u00eddky \u201eGrih Daah\u201c od Premchanda.<\/p>\n

ChatGPT vytvo\u0159il pozoruhodn\u011b \u00fa\u010dinn\u00e9 p\u0159eklady, z\u016fstal v\u011brn\u00fd p\u016fvodn\u00edmu v\u00fdznamu a zachoval autorovu stylistickou integritu:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

Naproti tomu Gemini zpo\u010d\u00e1tku z\u00e1pasil s po\u017eadavkem na p\u0159eklad a vykazoval znateln\u00e9 zpo\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed v dob\u011b odezvy. Tato nekonzistence ve v\u00fdkonu je u Gemini b\u011b\u017en\u011b hl\u00e1\u0161en\u00fdm probl\u00e9mem.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> ChatGPT<\/strong><\/p>\n

9. Test k\u00f3dov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/h2>\n

Abychom vyhodnotili jejich k\u00f3dovac\u00ed dovednosti, p\u0159edstavili jsme standardn\u00ed optimaliza\u010dn\u00ed probl\u00e9m:<\/p>\n

V\u00fdzva:<\/strong> Provide the Python code for the Travelling Salesman Problem.<\/code><\/p>\n

ChatGPT reagoval efektivn\u011b a ke k\u00f3dov\u00e1n\u00ed vyu\u017e\u00edval sv\u016fj integrovan\u00fd re\u017eim Canvas, kter\u00fd umo\u017e\u0148oval okam\u017eit\u00e9 spu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed k\u00f3du a mo\u017enosti lad\u011bn\u00ed:<\/p>\n

Gemini na druh\u00e9 stran\u011b vynikalo poskytov\u00e1n\u00edm spolehliv\u00e9ho k\u00f3du, ale postr\u00e1dalo interaktivn\u00ed rozhran\u00ed k\u00f3du, jako je ChatGPT Canvas:<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> ChatGPT<\/strong><\/p>\n

10. Jehla v testu kupky sena<\/h2>\n

Tento test vyz\u00fdv\u00e1 modely um\u011bl\u00e9 inteligence k nalezen\u00ed konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed informac\u00ed ve v\u011bt\u0161\u00edm dokumentu. Pou\u017eili jsme prvn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1st Pu\u0161kinovy \u200b\u200bpov\u00eddky \u201eKapit\u00e1nova dcera\u201c a p\u0159edlo\u017eili n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed v\u00fdzvu:<\/p>\n

V\u00fdzva:<\/strong> Identify which bread Mr. Joe's son ate from the following excerpt.<\/code><\/p>\n

ChatGPT okam\u017eit\u011b na\u0161el odpov\u011b\u010f: hn\u011bd\u00fd chl\u00e9b.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

V ostr\u00e9m kontrastu k tomu Gemini nedok\u00e1zali z\u00edskat informace, proto\u017ee se sna\u017eili analyzovat poskytnut\u00e9 podrobnosti, co\u017e ukazuje na nedostate\u010dnou efektivitu p\u0159i manipulaci se slo\u017eit\u00fdmi daty.<\/p>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> ChatGPT<\/strong><\/p>\n

11. H\u00e1dej filmov\u00fd test<\/h2>\n

V tomto z\u00e1bavn\u00e9m kole jsme hodnotili schopnost model\u016f rozpozn\u00e1vat obraz t\u00edm, \u017ee jsme identifikovali obl\u00edben\u00fd film:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>
Z\u00e1ti\u0161\u00ed z<\/span> Banshees of Inisherin (2022)<\/figcaption>

Oba modely film p\u0159esn\u011b pojmenovaly, p\u0159esto se ChatGPT poda\u0159ilo specifikovat zobrazen\u00e9 postavy (Colin Farrell a jeho osel), zat\u00edmco Gemini z\u00e1bavn\u011b nespr\u00e1vn\u011b identifikoval osla jako Colma Dohertyho.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n

V\u00edt\u011bz: <\/strong> ChatGPT<\/strong><\/p>\n

Celkov\u00fd v\u00edt\u011bz<\/h2>\n

Po se\u010dten\u00ed sk\u00f3re zv\u00edt\u011bzil model ChatGPT 4o se 6 v\u00fdhrami a 2 rem\u00edzami, co\u017e p\u0159edvedlo sv\u016fj robustn\u00ed v\u00fdkon v r\u016fzn\u00fdch testech a kompetenc\u00edch. Mezit\u00edm Gemini 1.5 Pro p\u0159edstavoval chv\u00e1lyhodnou v\u00fdzvu, vynikal v sumarizaci, generov\u00e1n\u00ed obr\u00e1zk\u016f a \u00fakolu \u201eukon\u010dit slovem\u201c a tak\u00e9 dosahoval parity v matematice i hodnocen\u00ed selsk\u00fdm rozumem.<\/p>\n

Nakonec ChatGPT p\u0159ed\u010dil Gemini v kritick\u00fdch oblastech, jako je k\u00f3dov\u00e1n\u00ed, p\u0159eklad, kreativita, vyhled\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed informac\u00ed a interpretace obr\u00e1zk\u016f. D\u00edky konzistentn\u00ed spolehlivosti ChatGPT vynik\u00e1 jako preferovan\u00fd partner AI, i kdy\u017e Gemini ukazuje potenci\u00e1l pro zlep\u0161en\u00ed, kdy\u017e jsou v\u00fdzvy optimalizov\u00e1ny. V na\u0161em hodnocen\u00ed v\u00fdsledky up\u0159ednost\u0148uj\u00ed ChatGPT pro ty, kte\u0159\u00ed up\u0159ednost\u0148uj\u00ed d\u016fv\u011bryhodnost a \u00fa\u010dinnost.<\/p>\n

\u010casto kladen\u00e9 ot\u00e1zky<\/h2>\n

1. Jak\u00e9 jsou hlavn\u00ed rozd\u00edly mezi ChatGPT 4o a Gemini 1.5 Pro?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Zat\u00edmco oba modely jsou pr\u00e9miov\u00fdmi chatboty s um\u011blou inteligenc\u00ed, ChatGPT 4o prok\u00e1zal vynikaj\u00edc\u00ed v\u00fdkon p\u0159i k\u00f3dov\u00e1n\u00ed, p\u0159ekladu a kreativn\u00edch \u00faloh\u00e1ch. Gemini 1.5 Pro v\u0161ak exceluje v sumarizaci a generov\u00e1n\u00ed obrazu.<\/p>\n

2. Kter\u00fd AI chatbot je lep\u0161\u00ed pro b\u011b\u017en\u00e9 u\u017eivatele?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Pro b\u011b\u017en\u00e9 u\u017eivatele, kte\u0159\u00ed hledaj\u00ed spolehlivost p\u0159i r\u016fzn\u00fdch \u00fakolech, je ChatGPT 4o obecn\u011b pova\u017eov\u00e1n za spolehliv\u011bj\u0161\u00ed volbu d\u00edky sv\u00e9mu konzistentn\u00edmu v\u00fdkonu a rozs\u00e1hl\u00fdm mo\u017enostem.<\/p>\n

3. Mohu tyto AI chatboty pou\u017e\u00edvat pro obchodn\u00ed \u00fa\u010dely?<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Absolutn\u011b! ChatGPT 4o i Gemini 1.5 Pro jsou vhodn\u00e9 pro podnikov\u00e9 aplikace, v\u010detn\u011b automatizace z\u00e1kaznick\u00fdch slu\u017eeb, vytv\u00e1\u0159en\u00ed obsahu a anal\u00fdzy dat, co\u017e z nich d\u011bl\u00e1 cenn\u00e9 n\u00e1stroje v profesion\u00e1ln\u00edm prost\u0159ed\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Zdroj a obr\u00e1zky<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Krajina AI chatbot\u016f se vyv\u00edj\u00ed neb\u00fdvalou rychlost\u00ed. Jakmile jedna organizace odhal\u00ed sv\u016fj nejnov\u011bj\u0161\u00ed model, konkurenti jej rychle n\u00e1sleduj\u00ed a sna\u017e\u00ed se navz\u00e1jem p\u0159edb\u011bhnout. Navzdory tomu, \u017ee se ChatGPT od OpenAI t\u011b\u0161\u00ed brzk\u00e9mu veden\u00ed v t\u00e9to konkuren\u010dn\u00ed ar\u00e9n\u011b, soupe\u0159i jako Gemini rychle z\u00edskali trakci a sofistikovanost. Mezi sou\u010dasn\u00e9 pr\u016fkopn\u00edky ve v\u00fdvoji AI chatbot\u016f pat\u0159\u00ed modely ChatGPT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[95,180,107,121],"class_list":["post-7890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-how-to","tag-ai","tag-chatgpt","tag-comparison","tag-google-gemini"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7890"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7890\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7891,"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7890\/revisions\/7891"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/howtogeek.blog\/cs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}